United States v. Killip’s Empirical Analysis
819 F.2d 1542 · 1987
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2020 · most notably United States v. Wells (1997), United States v. Angiulo (1990)
26 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · Holmes v. United States · Porzig v. Nolden · Hildebrand v. Social Security Administration
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[j]oinder [wa]s clearly proper under Fed.R.Crim. P. 8(b), because the [g]overnment alleged that Mr. [McMillan] had 'participated in the same ... series of acts or transactions' as the other defendants.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“has waived the issue unless he can show that actual prejudice resulted from the joint trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a relation between the predicate offenses and the affairs of the enterprise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.