Guerrero v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis
819 F.2d 238 · 1987
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2000
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412
Relies on Baxter v. Claytor · Nichols v. Hughes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“excuse a failure to file within three years after discovery if it finds it to be in the interest of justice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“According to a letter submitted to Congress by the Secretary of the Army, the Board’s practice has been to undertake a review of each case on the merits as a prerequisite to determining whether it would be “in the interest of justice” to waive the statute of limitations. The Secretary of the Army to Chairman of the House Committee on Armed Services, December 22, 1965, H.R.Rep. No. 1825, 89th Cong., 2nd Sess. 3-4 (1966). We assume that the Board would apply the same policy here unless, for reasons unknown to us, the Board has had occasion to abandon this apparently sensible approach.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is indeed possible and perhaps probable that the revocation referred to is the revocation of January 17, 1950 which was specifically disapproved by the memorandum of July 6, 1951.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Guerrero v. Stone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.