Nodine v. Textron, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
819 F.2d 347 · 1987
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 11 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably Hecht v. Commerce Clearing House, Inc. (1990), Pelletier v. Zweifel (1991)
30 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 1510 · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago v. Haroco Inc · Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank & Trust Co. · Morast v. Lance · Bankers Trust Co. v. Rhoades
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[f]iring Nodine under these circumstances was wrong, but it did not violate the RICO act”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the plaintiff only has standing if, and can only recover to the extent that, he has been injured in his business or property by the conduct constituting the violation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“did not flow directly from the predicate acts”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.