Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 819 F.2d 904 - Orloff v. Allman

Orloff v. Allman’s Empirical Analysis

819 F.2d 904 · 1987

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Nos. 90-2039, 90-2040 (1992), Hollinger

21 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

2801987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77O (§ 15 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · United States 77-1359 v. Kimbell Foods Inc · Smith v. Harmsen · Cosoff v. Rodman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “kind of 'inequitable' result that makes alter ego liability appropriate is an abuse of the corporate form, such as undercapitalization or misrepresentation of the corporate structure to creditors.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “actual power or influence over the alleged controlled person.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “within the meaning of section 20(a) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78t(a). The statute provides: 4 Every person who, directly or indirectly, controls any person liable under any provision of this chapter or of any rule or regulation thereunder shall also be liable jointly and severally with and to the same extent as such controlled person ... is liable, unless the controlling person acted in good faith and did not directly or indirectly induce the act or acts constituting the violation or cause of action. 5 The district court went on to say that the Ninth Circuit had held a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.