United States v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis
819 F.3d 310 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1111 · 18 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood · United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal · Greer v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'official animus' or a 'conscious effort to suppress exculpatory evidence,' " and necessarily turns on an official's subjective knowledge that the evidence in question had exculpatory value at the time it was lost or destroyed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'official animus' or a 'conscious effort to suppress exculpatory evidence,'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.