Reid v. Donelan’s Empirical Analysis
819 F.3d 486 · 2016
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 9 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Reno v. Flores · Zadvydas v. Davis · Carlson v. Landon · Demore District Director San Francisco District of Immigration and Naturalization Service et al. v. Kim · Department of the Interior and Bureau of Indian Affairss v. Klamath Water Users Protective Association
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the likelihood that the [underlying] proceedings will culminate in a final removal order.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. G.P. v. Garland · Reid v. Donelan“[A]ppeals and petitions for relief are to be expected as a natural part of the process. An alien who would not normally be subject to indefinite detention cannot be so detained merely because he seeks to explore avenues of relief that the law makes available to him. Further, although an alien may be responsible for seeking relief, he is not responsible for the amount of time that such determinations may take. The mere fact that an alien has sought relief from deportation does not authorize the INS to drag its heels indefinitely in making a decision. The entire process, not merely the original deportation hearing, is subject to the constitutional requirement of reasonability.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“random outcomes resulting from individual habeas litigation in which some detainees are represented by counsel and some are not, and some habeas petitions are adjudicated in months and others are not adjudicated for years.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Reid v. Donelan · Hamama v. Adducci
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.