Wolfe v. Clarke’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Schlup v. Delo · Hilton v. Braunskill · Gross v. Irtz · Marino v. Vasquez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) [W]hether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceedings; and (4) where the public interest lies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dumas v. Clarke“Where the State establishes that it has a strong likelihood of success on appeal, or where, failing that, it can nonetheless demonstrate a substantial case on the merits,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dumas v. Clarke“to retry [the petitioner] before [it] ha[d] clarity from the Fourth Circuit as to its obligations during [such] retrial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dumas v. Clarke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.