State v. Singh’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 2002
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Baker · State v. Johnson · State v. Perdue · 19 Utah 2d 426 - State v. Valdez · State v. Torres
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'We review for correctness a trial court's statutory interpretation, according it no particular deference.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Under that standard, two conditions must be satisfied before a trial court is required to give the requested instruction: (1) the statutory elements of the offense charged must overlap with those of the included offenses; and (2) the evidence adduced at trial must provide a rational basis for a verdict acquitting defendant of the offense charged and convicting him or her of the included offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pharris“Despite [the mother's] efforts to add additional elements to the statute, we find [this section] to be clear and unambiguous.... [Thus] we conclude that [the mother's] interpretation is untenable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State Ex Rel. Nkc
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.