People v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1992
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kogan v. People · Bartlett v. CONTINENTAL DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY · People v. Prante · 10 Mass. App. Ct. 190 - Commonwealth v. Davis · People in Interest of DLE
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Deadly weapon” means any of the following which in the manner it is used or intended to be used is capable of producing death or serious bodily injury: (I) A firearm, whether loaded or unloaded; (II) A knife; (III) A bludgeon; or (IV) Any other weapon, device, instrument, material, or substance, whether animate or inanimate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Ross“(1) A person commits the crime of assault in the second degree if: [[Image here]] (b) With intent to cause bodily injury to another person, he causes or attempts to cause such injury to any person by means of a deadly weapon[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Ross
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.