Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

819 So. 2d 254

N.P.L. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-06-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2003

1 state decisions

Relies on 742 So. 2d 261 - JMJ v. State · KLP v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-06-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this juvenile delinquency appeal, we vacate the amended disposition orders entered, and remand with directions that the trial court enter a separate order for each offense, rather than each case. E.g., K.L.P. v. State, 783 So.2d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (and cases cited therein); J.M.J. v. State, 742 So.2d 261, 263 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Because it appears that appellant had served the maximum commitment permitted by law for the second-degree misdemeanor offenses before the second affidavit of violation of probation was filed, see § 985.231(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (1999), the trial court may not enter orders relating to those offenses. Appellant need not be present for these purely ministerial acts.

¶2*255DISPOSITION ORDERS VACATED and REMANDED, with directions.

BARFIELD, WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur.
/819/so2d/254 · .json · Public domain