Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 819 SO2D 936 - Marconi v. Walther

Marconi v. Walther’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 683 So. 2d 209 - Hipschman v. Cochran · 727 So. 2d 359 - Walker v. Edel · Koll v. Koll · Lanza v. Lanza · Reynolds v. Reynolds

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A civil contempt order must contain a specific purge provision that adequately informs the contemnor what he or she must do to purge the contempt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A person charged with civil contempt is entitled to an opportunity to be heard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.