State v. Reynolds’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2018
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Benton v. Maryland · Hirabayashi v. United States · Claassen v. United States · Pierce v. United States · Luleff v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he armed criminal action statute ... § 571.015, in clearest terms, imposes its penalty upon those “who use dangerous instruments or deadly weapons in the commission of felonies.” The explicit language could hardly be simpler or more expressive of the legislative intent: “[A]ny person who commits any felony ... by, with, or through the use, assistance, or aid of a dangerous instrument or deadly weapon is also guilty of the crime of armed criminal action.” It means that the use of a dangerous instrument or deadly weapon is an element of the crime ... That ... is the uniform understanding the appellate decisions impart to the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Dudley“[t]o deny review of [one] conviction ... because [a defendant] did not challenge [an additional conviction] on appeal, as the [concurrent sentence] doctrine allows, would be to subject [the defendant] to disabilities and legal consequences unique to that offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Carter“... any person who commits any felony under the laws of this state by, with, or through the use, assistance, or aid of a dangerous instrument or deadly weapon is also guilty of the crime of armed criminal action ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Boyd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.