Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 819 SW2D 400 - Beardsley v. Beardsley

Beardsley v. Beardsley’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Scanlon v. Kansas City · Baker v. Estate of Brown · State v. Quilling · Robinson v. Estate of Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The testimony of an expert is to be considered like any other testimony, is to be tried by the same test and receive just so much weight and credit as the jury (or judge) may deem it entitled to when viewed in connection with all other circumstances. There is no logical distinction between expert opinion testimony and fact testimony and the values of both are to be measured by precisely the same standards. The rule is not different even though the expert evidence is uncontradicted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.