Bowles v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2007
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Quock Ting v. United States · Dewey v. Clark · Bowen v. Mount Vernon Sav. Bank · Wynne v. Boone · Thomas v. Doyle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the sole source for inference of ... deceit may be the circumstances of the transaction”). 6 .The Lawyers also reminded the court that in her answers to the Lawyers’ interrogatories, Ms. Flax had not specifically identified a fraudulent-inducement claim. 7 . We conclude that a remand is warranted even though the viability of Ms. Flax's fraudulent-inducement-related claim is far from clear. Although Mr. Flax may have been able to prove in the underlying litigation that Fischer induced him to provide”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Flax v. Schertler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.