¶1The Court of Claims providently exercised its discretion in denying the claimant’s petition for leave to file a late claim. Upon weighing the statutory factors set forth in Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) (see Edens v State of New York, 259 AD2d 729, 730 [1999]; Holly v State of New York, 191 AD2d 678 [1993]), the Court of Claims properly determined that the claimant failed to come forth with a reasonable excuse for his failure to file a timely claim and failed to demonstrate that his claim was potentially meritorious. Dillon, J.E, Leventhal, Belen, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.
82 A.D.3d 1109
Tinyes v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 22, 2011
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2011-03-22
Decided 2011-03-22