Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 ALA 158 - Frenkel v. Hudson

Frenkel v. Hudson’s Empirical Analysis

1886

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
17
states following
September 1972
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently September 1972 · most notably McCaskill Company v. United States (1910), 8 E.H. Smith 715 - Benedict v. . Arnoux (1898)

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 43 state decisions — followed in 17 states

1401886189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lucas v. Bank of Darien · Wickersham v. Chicago Zinc Co. · Spira v. Hornthall, Whitehead, Weissman & Co. · Terrell v. Branch Bank at Mobile · Reid v. Bank of Mobile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘‘It has no application,’ however, to a case where the agent acts for himself, in his own interest and adversely to that of his principal. His adversary character and antagonistic interests take him out of the operation of the general rule for two reasons: First, that he will very likely in such case act for himself rather than for his principal; and, secondly, he will not be likely to communicate to the principal the fact which he is interested in concealing. It would be both unjust and unreasonable to impute notice by mere construction under such circumstances, and such is the established rule of law upon the subject.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.