Baxley v. Laster’s Empirical Analysis
1907
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 1993
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bonney v. King · Scanlan v. Guiling · 1 Kan. App. 131 - Wurmser v. Stone · Chambers v. Perry · Driggs' Bank v. Norwood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But if he employed process, legally and properly issued, wrongfully and unlawfully for a purpose which by law it was not intended to effect, he was guilty of a malicious abuse of process, and would be liable in damages for the abuse.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lewis v. Burdine
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.