82 Ark. 547
Decided April 29, 1907
Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1907-04-29
<p>Appeal — insufficiency of abstract. — Where appellant’s abstract is insufficient, the court will not explore the transcript for errors.</p>
Relies on Shorter University v. Franklin · Ruble v. Helm · Beavers v. Security Mutual Insurance
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
affirmed · Decided 1907-04-29
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1975
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The abstract of the appellant in this case is so deficient that the court is unable to ascertain the facts without exploring the record, which the oourt must decline' to do, as explained in Ruble v. Helm, 57 Ark. 304. See also applications to this rule in the following cases: Shorter University v. Franklin, 75 Ark. 571; Beavers v. Security Mutual Ins. Co., 76 Ark. 138.
¶2For these reasons the judgment is affirmed.