82 Ark. App. 589 - Porter v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. State · Flores v. State · Edmond v. State · Miles v. State · Tauber v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the crime charged. Therefore, the state must prove not only that appellant was intoxicated, but also that he operated or was in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while intoxicated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Porter v. State“In order to convict, the State must prove all elements under both subsections of Ark.Code Ann. § 5-65-103.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Porter v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.