In Re Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2014
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522
Relies on Westin Crown Plaza Hotel Co. v. King · Fern O. Anderson v. Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Corporation, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, (Intervenor Below). Robert D. Adam v. Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Corporation, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, (Intervenor Below) · Boyer v. ITT Financial Services (In Re Boyer) · Lanzoni v. ITT Financial Services (In Re Lanzoni) · In Re Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““513.430. The following property shall be exempt from attachment and execution ... (1) Household furnishings, household goods, ... that are held primarily for personal, family or household use of such person or a dependent of such person, not to exceed one thousand dollars in value ...””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Oglesby
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.