In Re Bauckey’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2001
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 28 U.S.C. § 1930 (§ 246 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (Title 11)) · 28 U.S.C. § 451
Relies on Boddie v. Connecticut · S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · United States v. Kras · Becker's Motor Transportation Inc Needham's Motor Service Inc v. Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service · United States v. Jenkins (In Re Richardson)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Supreme Court of the United States, courts of appeals, district courts constituted by chapter 5 of this title, including the Court of International Trade and any court created by Act of Congress the judges of which are entitled to hold office during good behavior.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perroton v. Gray“[n]otwithstanding section 1915 of this title, the parties commencing a case under title 11 shall pay the clerk”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perroton v. Gray“[w]hile there is no doubt that § 1930 and Kras are controlling, a second argument also disposes of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perroton v. Gray
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.