Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 CALAPP2D 275 - Blackman v. Howes

Blackman v. Howes’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
3
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Gagne v. Bertran (1954), 147 Cal. App. 2d 357 - Stevens v. Marco (1956)

43 state decisions

26019471950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co. · Seeger v. Odell · Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp. · Lashley v. Koerber · 18 Cal. App. 2d 69 - Carpenter v. Hamilton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The misrepresentations of earnings in the present case fall into a category for which the Carpenter case makes a specific exception, i.e., ‘that a buyer is not required to employ experts to investigate matters of a technical nature as to which the seller has full knowledge and the buyer none, and if for this reason the investigation is incomplete, he may show that he relied upon the representation as to matters which he did not investigate. ’ . . . another exception specified in the Carpenter case applies, namely, that a buyer is not chargeable with knowledge of conditions that he fails to discover because of some artifice or deception of the seller.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““When the facts are susceptible to opposing inferences, whether a party relied upon a false representation, notwithstanding prior information which, if investigated, might have led to discovery of the falsity of the representation, is itself a question of fact to be determined by the trier of fact.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.