Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 CALAPP2D 467 - Nash v. Wright

Nash v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
December 1986
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 1986

3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

8019471950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 20 Cal. 2d 457 - Blank v. Coffin · Anthony v. Hobbie · 11 Cal. 2d 64 - Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp. · Shields v. Oxnard Harbor District · 41 Cal. App. 323 - Maupin v. Solomon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Moreover, the truck was driven by Belyea’s employee. It is not to be denied that in an action for personal injuries caused by the negligence of an employee while operating his employer’s motor car it is reasonable to infer that the use of the vehicle was authorized by the owner and that the employee was acting within the scope of his employment. (Shields v. Oxnard Harbor District, 46 Cal.App.2d 477, 487 [ 116 P.2d 121 ]; Bushnell v. Tashiro, 115 Cal.App. 563, 565 [ 2 P.2d 550 ]; Blank v. Coffin, 20 Cal.2d 457, 460 [ 126 P.2d 868 ].) The general manager of Belyea testified that Wright was in the employ of Belyea on November 15, and that he was at the shop all day of the 14th.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.