Palpar, Inc. v. Thayer’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently January 1978 · most notably 109 Cal. App. 2d 803 - Utz v. Aureguy (1952), San Jose Abstract & Title Insurance v. Elliott (1952)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Elms v. Elms · Welch v. Alcott · 69 Cal. App. 2d 560 - Wilcox v. Sway · Crescent Lumber Co. v. Larson · Ortega v. Cordero
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under Code of Civil Procedure, section 647, ‘the final decision’ is ‘deemed to have been excepted to’ and the insufficiency of the finding to support the judgment may be urged on appeal although appellant neither excepted to the findings nor sought their amendment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bailey v. Leeper
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.