Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 CALAPP4TH 1404 - People v. Sherwin

People v. Sherwin’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 15 Cal. 3d 286 - Murgia v. Municipal Court · 34 Cal. 3d 711 - People v. Laiwa · 52 Cal. 2d 330 - People v. Prewitt · 4 Cal. 3d 605 - People v. Superior Court · People v. Valenti

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purpose of a motion to set aside the accusatory pleading under Penal Code section 995 is to review the sufficiency of the indictment or information on the basis of the record made before the grand jury in the one case or the magistrate at the preliminary hearing in the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “reduce the waste of unnecessary court time in resolving search and seizure questions ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.