82 Cal. App. 4th 837 - People v. Matelski’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"None of the Glaser facts were present here. There was no search warrant. There was no evidence of illegal activity on the premises. The officers could have determined in seconds that the Matelskis were not residents of the home. The detention of the Matelskis was admittedly not for the purpose of officer safety. The situation was not unstable. There was no ' "specific and articulable facts" that reasonably warrant[ed] the intrusion on personal liberty and privacy.' " ( Matelski , supra , 82 Cal.App.4th at p. 854 [ 98 Cal.Rptr.2d 543 ] (dis. opn. of Gaut, J.).)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. People v. Gutierrez

2. “Rather, ... in such review it is `the ultimate responsibility of the appellate court to measure the facts, as found by the trier, against the constitutional standard of reasonableness.' [Citation.] On that issue, in short, the appellate court exercises its independent judgment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 87 Cal. App. 4th 1265 - People v. Weise

3. “there was a need to determine [the] defendants' connection to the probationer because the probationer was prohibited by his general terms of probation from consorting with convicted felons.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. People v. Gutierrez