Roehr v. Bliss’s Empirical Analysis
82 F. 445 · 1897
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 1900
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Vigel v. Hopp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) As a new article of manufacture, a completed door frame, consisting of the facings and the jamb divided longitudinally in two parts, the sections being secured to opposite facings, and adapted to be applied to the wall opening from opposite sides, substantially as described. (2) As a new article of manufacture, a completed door frame, consisting of the facings and an interlocking jamb divided longitudinally in two parts, the sections being secured to the opposite facings, and adapted to be applied to the wall .opening from opposite sidos, and looked together, substantially as described. (¾ As a now article of manufacture, a completed door frame, consisting of the facings and lite jamb divided longitudinally In two parts, having their abutting faces tongue;! and. grooved, respectively, the sections being secured to the opposite facings, and adapted to interlock with each other when the two parts of the frame are applied to the wall opening from opposite sides, substantially as described.” >”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Roehr v. Bliss
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.