Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 F.2d 158 - Rumsey v. Commissioner

Rumsey v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

82 F.2d 158 · 1936

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
April 1984
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 1984 · most notably Morton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1949), Schmidlapp v. Commissioner (1938)

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

120193619401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 23 · 26 U.S.C. § 24

Relies on Heiner v. Tindle · Bolling v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “losses incurred in any transaction entered into for profit, though not connected with a trade or business.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the fact that a man first rents his house before selling it is only significant as evidentiary of his purpose to abandon it as a residence and to devote the property to business uses; that renting is not the sole criterion of such purpose, as the regulations themselves imply by the words 'rented or otherwise appropriated' to income producing purposes.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “otherwise appropriated to income-producing purposes”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.