Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 F.2d 5 - Huffman v. Baldwin

Huffman v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis

82 F.2d 5 · 1936

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
October 2015
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2015 · most notably Pullman Co. v. Jenkins (1939), 422 F. Supp. 1346 - Marquette Nat. Bank v. First Nat. Bank of Omaha (1976)

15 federal appellate · 3 district ·

150193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mansfield Ry Co v. Swan · Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co. · Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Cockrell · Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. Thompson · Wecker v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court need only consider whether there is a real intention on the part of the plaintiff to secure a joint judgment, or whether there is only a colorable ground for such claim shown by the record. The court on motion to remand will not examine plaintiff’s pleading closely enough to determine whether a flaw might be found in it on special demurrer, but even though plaintiff may have misconceived his cause of action and may have no right to maintain it against the defendants jointly, yet that does not necessarily convert an alleged joint cause of action into a separable controversy for the purpose of removal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.