Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 F.2d 971 - Wells v. Cermak

Wells v. Cermak’s Empirical Analysis

82 F.2d 971 · 1936

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2019

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

50193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harrison v. Chamberlin · Schumacher v. Beeler · 115 Ohio St. 247 - Webb v. Western Reserve Bond & Share Co. · Horn v. Pere Marquette R. · Beeler v. Schumacher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A judgment is not what is entered but what was directed by the court ... In the very nature of things, the act must be perfect before its history can be so; and the imperfection or neglect of its history fails to modify or obliterate the act.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.