Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 F.3d 1431 - Freedom to Travel Campaign v. Newcomb

Freedom to Travel Campaign v. Newcomb’s Empirical Analysis

82 F.3d 1431 · 1996

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
December 2024
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme et L'Antisemitisme (2006), Diego Militia v. Reno (1996)

41 federal appellate · 7 district ·

3901996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Kolender v. Lawson · Mistretta v. United States · Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Legal questions that require little factual development are more likely to be ripe.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If it is “inevitable” that the challenged rule will “operat[e]” to the plaintiffs disadvantage — if the court can make a firm prediction that the plaintiff will apply for the benefit, and that the agency will deny the application by virtue of the [challenged] rule — then there may well be a justiciable controversy that the court may find prudent to resolve.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[g]iven the lesser importance of ... freedom to travel abroad, the Government need only advance a rational, or at most an important, reason for imposing the ban.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.