in Re Stac Electronics Securities Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
March 2003
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston · Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson · In re Disbarment of Johnson · Gozlon-Peretz v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the Company believes it provides adequate allowances for returns, there can be no assurance that actual returns in excess of recorded allowances will not result in a material adverse effect on business, operating results and financial condition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In order to be liable for unreasonably disclosed third-party forecasts, defendants must have put their imprimatur, express or implied, on the projections.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“only if reasonable minds could not disagree that the challenged statements were not misleading should the district court dismiss under 12(b)(6).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.