Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 F.3d 383 - Cb Breeding Tp v. Driscoll E

Cb Breeding Tp v. Driscoll E’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
7
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 5 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably State v. Bishop (2009), Thomas v. Roberts (2003)

1 federal appellate · 5 district · 9 state decisions

2401990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parratt v. Taylor · Benton v. Maryland · Goss v. Lopez · Alabama v. White · Plyler v. Doe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the school context, it is both impossible and undesirable for administrators involved in incidents of misbehavior always to be precluded from acting as decisionmakers.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “school officials need only 'reasonable grounds for suspecting' that a search will turn up evidence that the student has violated either the law or school rules”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The tip in this case provided sufficient probability, viewed against the "reasonable grounds" standard, to justify the search here. A fellow student provided the information that C.B. carried drugs with the intent of selling them . . . to administrators directly, rather than anonymously, and was thus more likely to be reliable because the student informant faced the possibility of disciplinary repercussions if the information was misleading.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.