Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

82 F.3d 409

Docket No. 94-7119.

Bruce E. Anderson v. Warden, Bland Correctional Center

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Nov. 30, 1995. Decided April 19, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-04-19

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Farley v. Wp Coal Company

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-04-19

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-93-759)

Bruce E. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine P. Baldwin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Anderson v. Warden, No. CA-93-759 (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to disposition by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1988)

/82/f3d/409 · .json · Public domain