Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

82 F.3d 410

Docket Nos. 95-8522, 96-6101.

Kelly v. Freeman

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • Leonard Ricky KELLY, Plaintiff--v.Franklin FREEMAN; Tom Martin; One Unknown Defendant, Defendants--
  • Leonard Ricky KELLY, Plaintiff--v.Franklin FREEMAN; Tom Martin; One Unknown Defendant, Defendants--

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: March 21, 1996. Decided: April 16, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-04-16

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Hyman v. Beshears

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-04-16

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-816)

Leonard Ricky Kelly, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kelly v. Freeman, No. CA-95-816 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9 & Dec. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/82/f3d/410 · .json · Public domain