Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

82 F.3d 422

Docket No. 95-16762.

Hall v. Browning

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 26, 1996.* Decided April 1, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-04-01

Relies on United States v. Mitchell · Mireles v. Waco · Bc Enterprises Ltd Valley National Bank v. Bc Enterprises Limited

Decided 1996-04-01

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

¶1

MEMORANDUM…

¶2

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's Order filed on August 15, 1995. See Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11 (1991); United States v. Mitchell, 445 U.S. 535, 538 (1980).

¶3

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

…

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

/82/f3d/422 · .json · Public domain