United States v. Ajugwo’s Empirical Analysis
82 F.3d 925 · 1996
Citation profile
66 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 142 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably United States v. Real-Hernandez (1996), United States v. Nunez (2000)
66 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 21 U.S.C. § 963
Relies on Clampitt v. Interinsurance Exchange · Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co. · 115 S. Ct. 89 - Green v. United States · Clampitt v. Interinsurance Exchange · United States v. Harvey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 142 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all information and evidence ... concerning the offense or offenses that were part of the same course of conduct or of a common scheme or plan.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e have placed the burden on the defendant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that she should receive a sentence reduction under the guidelines based upon some mitigating factor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is a fundamental rule of contract law that the terms of a clear and unambiguous written contract cannot be changed by parol evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.