Teper v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
82 F.3d 989 · 1996
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022 · most notably Melhorn v. United States (1996), Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp. (2006)
10 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Buckley v. Valeo · Hines v. Davidowitz · Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) The provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, and rules and regulations issued thereunder, supersede and preempt any provision of State law with respect to election to Federal office. (b) Federal law supersedes State law concerning the— (1)Organization and registration of political committees supporting Federal candidates; (2) Disclosure of receipts and expenditures by Federal candidates and political committees; and (3) Limitations on contributions and expenditures regarding Federal candidates and political committees. (c) The Act does not supersede State laws which provides for the— (1) Manner of qualifying as a candidate or political organization; (2) Dates and places of elections; (3) Voter registration; (4) Prohibition of false registration, voting fraud, theft of ballots and similar offenses; or (5) Candidate’s personal financial disclosure.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in which Congress regulates a field so pervasively, or federal law touches on a field implicating such a dominant federal interest, that an intent for federal law to occupy the field exclusively may be inferred; (3)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.