Clemons v. Waller’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1681Q · 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 28 U.S.C. § 2107 · 49 U.S.C. § 30307 · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on Smith v. Maryland · Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. Roper · Nguyen v. City of Cleveland · Foster v. Barilow · United States v. Campagnuolo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“By citing Pasha, Congress strongly intimated that one who impersonates the intended receiver of a communication may still be a party to that communication for the purposes of the federal wiretap statute and that such conduct is not proscribed by the statute.”). 75 . Cf. Desnick v. Am. Broad. Companies, Inc., 44 F.3d 1345 , 1352 (7th Cir.1995) (“The law's willingness to give effect to consent procured by fraud is not limited to the tort of trespass.”). 76 . See Black’s Law Dictionary (10th ed.2014) (defining”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.