Saylor v. Bastedo’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
November 1983
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 119
Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah · Difronzo v. United States · Anderson v. Yungkau · In re Josephson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“seemingly' because although the opinion concludes by stating that "the motion to substitute pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1) is denied,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Saylor v. Bastedo“required to invite litigation by refusing to substitute and leaving the matter in procedural limbo”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Saylor v. Bastedo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.