Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 FSUPP 929 - MacDonald v. Winfield Corp.

MacDonald v. Winfield Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1982
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 1982

2 state decisions

2019481950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Continental Collieries, Inc. v. Shober · American Preservers' Trust v. Taylor Manuf'g Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * there is no justification for dismissing a complaint for insufficiency of statement, except where it appears to a certainty that the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of the claim. * * * ” Continental Collieries v. Shober, 3 Cir., 1942, 130 F.2d 631, 635 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.