Puckett v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 11 U.S.C. § 501 · 11 U.S.C. § 505 · 26 U.S.C. § 6672
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Cruz v. Beto · Cromwell v. County of Sac
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Technically, a ‘post-answer Rule 12(b)(6) motion is untimely and some other vehicle, such as a motion for judgment on the pleadings or for summary judgment, must be used to challenge the failure to state a claim for relief.’ ” However, courts do not mechanically or routinely deny any motion made after a responsive pleading as untimely. If the defendant has previously included in the answer the defense raised in the motion, thereby giving notice, then courts generally allow Rule 12(b)(6) motions filed after the answer. In this context, the Rule 12(b)(6) motion becomes tantamount to a preliminary hearing under Rule 12(d). The courts consider Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss filed after a responsive pleading, not as a Rule 12(b) motion, but as a Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings. However, a court applies the same standards to such a motion that are applied to motions timely filed under Rule 12(b)(6).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jones v. Lopez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.