State v. Domingo’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[generally, a guilty plea made volun-. tarily and intelligently precludes a defendant from later asserting any nonju-risdictional claims [on appeal], including constitutional challenges to the pretrial proceedings. Although the defendant may still challenge the sufficiency of the indictment or other like defects bearing directly upon the government’s authority to compel the defendant to answer to charges in court, claims of nonjwrisdictional defects in the proceeding, such as unlawfully obtained evidence and illegal detention, mil generally not survive the plea. A plea of nolo contendere is equivalent to a plea of guilty in terms of waiving alleged nonju-risdictional defects.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Kealaiki · Adams v. State

2. “With the approval of the court and the consent of the State, a defendant may enter a conditional plea of guilty or nolo contendere, reserving in writing the right, on appeal from the judgment, to seek review of the adverse determination of any specific pretrial motion. A defendant who prevails on appeal shall be allowed to withdraw the plea.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Kealaiki · State v. Vai Hapouli Lei