Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 ILL 50 - Harrington v. Stees

Harrington v. Stees’s Empirical Analysis

1876

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
7
states following
October 1955
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 1955

11 state decisions

40187618801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Woodcock v. Bennet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““At common law, it was not essential to the validity of a nuncupative will that the testator should have been ill at all. The statute is,, in this regard, a limitation of the common law powers. The words ‘in the time of the last sickness’ had no technical signification at the time of the passage of the statute. These words must be taken in their ordinary signification. The courts have no power to take from or add to the statute. It is their duty to carry out the will of the legislature as found in the words of the statute, and the necessary and reasonable implications arising from these words. The statute requires it to be proven that the will was made ‘in the last sickness.’ It is a reasonable and necessary implication that it must also appear that the testator, at the time of making the will, supposed that his then sickness would prove his last sickness—in other words, that he should be impressed with the probability that he would never recover.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.