¶1This was a prosecution against Keiser for selling intoxicating liquor to ’ one Charles Lowe by a less quantity than a quart at a time, without a license.
¶2The case is quite similar to that of the same appellant against the State, Keiser v. State, ante, p. 379, and the charge was similar to the one given in that case. For the reason given in that ease the judgment.herein must be reversed.
¶3The judgment below is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.