Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

82 Ind. App. 606

Schultz v. Rennick

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1925

Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1925-04-01

Relies on Rochester Bridge Co. v. McNeill · 72 Ind. App. 84 - Bailey v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.

Decided 1925-04-01

Dausman, C. J.

¶1(after making the foregoing statement) :

¶2We are of the opinion that, as against the objections stated in the memorandum, the complaint is good. Rochester Bridge Co. v. McNeill (1919), 188 Ind. 432; Bailey v. London Guarantee, etc., Co. (1918), 72 Ind. App. 84. The court did not err in overruling the motion to arrest judgment.

¶3The judgment is affirmed

/82/indapp/606 · .json · Public domain