Read v. Loftus’s Empirical Analysis
1910
Citation profile
2 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 1973
2 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Slocum v. Bracy · Hollingsworth v. Colthurst · Witbeck v. . Waine · Nothe v. Nomer · King Bros. v. Perfection Block Machine Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The parties by their contract agreed that the title should be made satisfactory to the plaintiff’s attorney. . . . That such a stipulation is valid and will be enforced is not an open question in this state. (Hollingsworth v. Colthurst, 78 Kan. 455 .)” (p. 493.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gould v. Stewart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.