Hampe v. Sage’s Empirical Analysis
1910
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 1963
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hurley v. Brown · Waring v. . Ayres · Jugla v. . Trouttet · White v. Breen · Ruzicka v. Hotovy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No action shall be brought whereby to charge a party upon . . . any contract for the sale of lands, tenements, or hereditaments, or any interest in or concerning them; . . . unless the agreement upon which such action shall be brought, or some memorandum or note thereof, shall be in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith, or some other person thereunto by him or her lawfully authorized in writing.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nauman v. Powers““Under the authorities cited, a recital that Sage owned the land which he undertook to convey can be found in the contract itself, by a liberal interpretation of its. terms. Proof that he owned no other land in that county would then render the description, as so-interpreted, absolutely definite.” (Hampe v. Sage, 82 Kan. 728, 733 , 109 Pac. 408 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hampe v. Sage““ ‘If the designation is so definite that the purchaser knows exactly what he is buying, and the seller knows what he is selling, and the land is so described that the court can, with the aid of extrinsic evidence, apply the description to the exact property intended to be sold, it is enough.’” (p. 733.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clark v. Larkin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.