Commonwealth v. Labadie’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1751 (Credit Union Amendments of 1987) · 18 U.S.C. § 656
Relies on Commonwealth v. Latimore · James Easton v. State of Iowa · New York v. Eno · Commonwealth v. Brzezinski · Commonwealth v. Ortiz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An officer, director, trustee, agent or employee of a bank, as defined in [G. L. c. 167, § 1,] who fraudulently converts, or fraudulently takes and secretes with intent so to do, any . . . money . . . which belongs to and is in possession of such bank, or which belongs to any person and is deposited therein, shall, whether intrusted with the custody thereof or not, be guilty of larceny from said bank.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.