82 Md. App. 282 - Joiner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
October 2003
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Rodriguez v. New York · 54 Cal. 2d 621 - People v. Gould · Leviton Et Al. v. United States · Tichnell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under Maryland case law, proof of a prior identification of the accused as the perpetrator of an alleged crime is admissible as substantive evidence, under an exception to the hearsay rule, if the person who made the identification is in attendance and available for cross-examination and the identification was made under circumstances preventing unfair suggestion or confusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The following statements previously made by a witness who testifies at the trial or hearing and who is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement are not excluded by the hearsay rule: (c) A statement that is one of identification of a person made after perceiving the person;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he standard to apply is “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.